Residues create a symbolic façade that hides institutional dysfunction.

Cofnas has stirred up a teapot tempest in academe. Prof Hall told me ideas matter. He IS doing a good job Whitney-Webbing the connections. He taught me about this guy Lacan whose critiques of our systematized seestumz of symobologies bust theirselves open on the Real.

Not just university faculties but entire political classes can succumb to action-for-its-own sake, thinly justified by fine verbalizations. The Crusades, for instance. A counterattack on the previous Islamic tide of aggression. Those ignoble knights did show their stuff, gotta admit. Then they turned against each other when the feudalistic s-curve flatlined.
It ain't just the Great Unwashed Publix that succumbs to scratching an itch they can't reach. University faculty (what Veblen called the "captains of erudition") get caught up in institutional irrelevancy. Maybe not so irrelevant because it's where the universitie' MAH-nee comes from.
The intellectual level of our society can do decent journeyman work on occasion. Correlated (feck, iron-veined causality) with periods when the prosperity engines fire correctly, but these always run down. Then everyone freaks out, sometimes with themselves.
My point ain't simply that elites can fall pretty to antic unreason, it's that status offers no immunity at all, and can even amplify the tendency.
I use antic unreason to describe the human impulse to act decisively even when one's understanding of the situation is incomplete, emptily symbolic (Veblen's "ceremonial"), or emotionally charged. "Yeah, Jew-boy!" Now the Jew is chasing everyone else...
It's the drive to “do something” — often ritualistically — rather than to understand the underlying causal structure.
Or to do it even if it's wrong.
Sex at cons must be fun, but the elites were there ahead of ya.
This impulse emerges from what he called non‑verbalized residues: deep, pre‑rational, inarticulate motivations that shape behavior more powerfully than articulated ideology.
Pareto’s residues. Groupthink is stronger. Symbolic commitments (prestige, mission, legacy) are more intense. Institutional inertia magnifies small irrational impulses. Costs of error are externalized onto the public. Yankees have one set; the Cavalier descendents of the slave plantocrats another. An uneasy coalition since the birth of this misbegotten nation.
This is visible in his discussion of elite policy circles shaping foreign affairs, where decisions often reflected ideological residues rather than empirical analysis. I swear this boy could have predicted the Axis. Perhaps he did.
He also documented how elite networks maintained continuity of policy even when the original rationale had faded — a classic case of antic unreason embedded in institutions.
The symmetry between elites and masses is not populist; it’s structural. Ordinary people act irrationally because they rely on symbols, myths, and social cues. Elites act irrationally because they rely on institutional myths, ideological residues, and prestige-driven narratives.
The difference is not susceptibility but scale of impact.
I'm starting to sound like Waves Forest. Ivan Stang really liked him.
Elites’ antic unreason can redirect entire national policies, financial systems, or geopolitical strategies. And it's baked in.
A symbolic commitment (e.g., “maintain global stability”) becomes a policy dogma. That dogma becomes a bureaucratic routine. The routine persists long after its original purpose is forgotten.
This is irrational activism at the civilizational scale — not because elites are foolish, but because institutions preserve residues long after the minds that created them are gone.
Pareto's residues are the deep, pre‑rational motivational forces that shape human behavior beneath conscious ideology. They are the non‑verbalized drivers of action — the impulses, habits, symbolic commitments, and emotional orientations that guide individuals and institutions long before any explicit reasoning or doctrine appears.
Whut the flyin' fook are “residues”. I borrowed the term from Vilfredo Pareto, but reworked it into my own highly derivative civilizational framework. It was part of my worldbuilding. So glad that's over, now that worldbuilding has become ossified into an institution, too. A residue is:
1️⃣ A non‑logical motivation.
2️⃣ A stable pattern of feeling or impulse.
3️⃣ A deep structure of behavior that persists across time.
4️⃣ Something people act on even if they cannot articulate it.
Residues are not irrational in the sense of “crazy”; they are pre‑rational — the emotional and symbolic bedrock on which rationalizations are later built. They are the why behind human action, even when the why is never stated. Alas and alack, much of it is culturally conditioned. It's why, after swarming like locusts across the continent, we've turned into carrion beetles, and are scouring the Sceptered Isle and Ukraine and trying to control all the supply-chain chokepoints the world over.
Once upon a time, institutions began as instrumentalities of human will — rational tools designed to solve problems. Over time, residues accumulate inside them:
- Prestige
- Tradition
- Ritual
- Identity
- Emotional commitments
- Status hierarchies
These residues gradually shift the institution’s behavior from problem‑solving to self‑preservation. This is the mechanism behind the rise and fall of civilizations.
Instrumentalities → Institutions → Vested Interests → Rigidity → Decay → Invasion. At our peak we invaded the whole world, knocking down the dry-rotted Other decaying civilizations that probably deserved it. The Opium War was a crappy move, though. The Chinese are still mad. And here we are at the gates again, wriggling our way into Mackinder's Heartland like we just discovered it. Those world wars and the depression put a hitch in our getalong. We were reconstituted, partly, and getting good at using our own organizational powers for advance. The flaw was leaving the commercial banks in the loop. MMT sez we don't need no stinkin' banksters.
Residues explain:
- Why elites cling to outdated policies.
- Why civilizations enter the Time of Troubles (starting with the Spanish-American War and the agrarian and labor unrest and culminating in the two world wars and depression.
- Why ideological movements persist after their original purpose fades.
- Why symbolic narratives override empirical evidence.
- Why institutional reform is so difficult. Poor FDR!
Let's follow Pareto's distinction.
- Residues = the deep motivations.
- Derivations = the rationalizations people give afterward.
People act from residues, then explain their actions using derivations. This is why a slew of sociologists insist that ideology is often a post‑hoc justification, not the true cause of behavior.
I suppose I hate the middle class outlook because it pretends it's the moral center of the universe. But it's so GRABBY now.
In spite of the metaphysical conceit of agency, residues are collective, not just individual
Quigley emphasizes that residues operate at the civilizational level:
- Shared myths
- Cultural symbols
- Elite prestige narratives
- Institutional traditions
- National identity stories
These collective residues shape the behavior of entire societies, not just individuals. Residues, the yellow buildup of the soul, are the deep, pre‑rational impulses that accumulate inside institutions over time. As these residues harden — prestige, ritual, identity, tradition, fear of loss — they gradually shift an institution away from problem‑solving and toward self‑preservation. This is the engine of institutional decay. In ancient Rome it was slavery; in modern USia it's the profit motive, Moloched in the form of the publicly-traded corporation and its unapologetic mutation, private equity.
Other examples:
- Bureaucracies claim “efficiency” while protecting internal fiefdoms.
- Militaries claim “security” while preserving prestige structures.
- Universities claim “excellence” while defending status hierarchies.
But it's when the instrumentality of economics hardens that the civilization is in serious trouble.
Friends tell me that underneath it all is the atman, closer to you than your own heartbeat yet farther than Beethoven's Sternenzelt.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Blueprint v. the Altar Call

Obama didn’t use the word deindustrialization as often as economists or critics did, but his administration’s stance is very clear in the record: he saw the long decline of U.S. manufacturing as a structural problem that needed active correction, not something to accept as inevitable.  In Obama’s view, deindustrialization was a threat to middle‑class stability. Obama consistently treated the erosion of manufacturing capacity as a danger to economic resilience and to the social fabric. His policy documents describe the loss of industrial jobs as something the federal government should reverse, not merely cushion. His “Blueprint to Support U.S. Manufacturing Jobs” explicitly framed offshoring as a harmful trend and proposed tax changes to discourage it. He regarded offshoring as a policy failure, not a natural market outcome.  Full marks, Mr. President!   His administration argued that the tax code rewarded firms for moving production overseas and needed to be rewritte...
Read more

The Throughput World Order

Image
Isn't Immanuel Wallerstein's "world system" just the latest variant of a Universal Empire? Not quite — and the distinction is pre'-damn-near illuminating once you tease apart what Wallerstein is describing and what Toynbee means by a Universal Empire. There's a rhyme, but they’re not the same creature. In fact, the gap between them is where the modern world hides its deepest structural weirdness. 1. A Universal Empire is a political unification. Toynbee’s Universal Empire is a single sovereign authority that forcibly knits together a civilization after its creative energies have died out. Its traits are unmistakable: - one imperial center   - one administrative shell   - one military monopoly   - coercive unity   - cultural mummification   Rome, Qin-Han, the Caliphate, the Mauryas — these are Universal Empires. They are states. A Universal Empire is a political solution to civilizational breakdown. 2. Wallerstein’s world-system is not a ...
Read more

The Century of Recovery

Image
Monbiot's reading list is pre=approved by moi. I have been following Raworth and Klein for years. They're hip to the evolutionary, historical, time-based entropy in human institutions which many take to last forever, taken for granted as products of natural law. My culture-hero character defined capitalism as profit-seeking in a price structure. He went on to say that fascism is the concluding form of capitalism. The seller will hold a gun to your head and compel you to buy only his product. This is when profit‑seeking detached from real human needs and from the social purpose that once justified it. And he's right to say that he saw a deep psychological deformation in the elites who came to dominate late‑stage financial capitalism when profit became an end in itself. Profit is never about human benefit, only incidentally. Human benefit is not its primary concern. The Quartet that financed Hitler were pseudo-psychotic psychopaths about profit. Any other system that did not ...
Read more