Posts

Epstein’s email reads like a pitch, not a manifesto

Image
Either Epstein is offering to overthrow Putin or he is helping Putin to collect kompromat. Both can be true, just as NATO expansion and Putin's claim that Ukraine is part of Russian Civilization is true. He can lie after that since lying (like blackmail) is part of the Russian defense mechanism. The Thiel email. Here’s the key thing I'm running into: I'm treating “the Dark Enlightenment” and “the Owners of Financialized Capital” as two clean, mutually exclusive blocs, when in reality they behave more like overlapping Venn diagrams with porous membranes, shared intermediaries, and opportunistic alliances. The Thiel–Epstein connection doesn’t contradict my model. It reveals the structure more clearly. Epstein was not “finance” — he was a broker of access. This is the first place where the contradiction dissolves. Epstein wasn’t a sovereign node of the OCGFC (Bolsen’s term).  He was a connector, a social graph optimizer, a black‑box concierge who: - linked money to science  ...

Something Has Made the Sci-Fi Kid Mad

Image
Damien Walter uses “modernity” in a very particular, almost dramaturgical way. He’s not just talking about “the modern era” in a historical sense; he’s talking about a civilizational operating system—a worldview that shapes how people imagine themselves, their agency, their stories, and their futures. Modernity is a story about the self. For Walter, modernity is fundamentally a narrative regime. It tells people: You are an individual. You are rational.  You can choose your own story. Progress is linear and inevitable. He often frames this as the “modern myth of the heroic individual,” which he believes is both empowering and deeply limiting. It’s the story that underwrites everything from self-help culture to superhero movies. Modernity is a break from tradition. Walter sees modernity as the moment when Western societies fractured the image and disenchanted the world. It replaced myth with science. It replaced tradition with choice. It replaced communal identity with personal ident...

The Time After This

Image
What worldview actually matches the lived reality, pressures, and latent capacities of a global supply‑chain workforce that might become a creative minority? 🌍 First: What defines this hypothetical creative minority? These workers: - operate inside planet‑scale interdependence - experience feedback loops, delays, cascades, and fragility firsthand   - have material literacy and temporal discipline - coordinate across cultures, languages, and jurisdictions   - are already living inside a systems-theoretic worldview   - are not elites, but they hold leverage and situational awareness   - are stratified but share a common operational reality   This is a class whose nervous systems are shaped by interbeing, whether or not they have a name for it. So the question becomes:  Which belief system amplifies their latent worldview and turns it into a civilizational outlook? 🧭 Engaged Buddhism vs. Dyerism for a Supply‑Chain Creative Minority H...

Osireion

If Wayne Dyer had actually sat down with Thorstein Veblen, the collision would have been spectacular—in the way tectonic plates are spectacular. You’d get uplift, subduction, and probably a few new mountain ranges in the landscape of American self‑help and social theory. Let me sketch the fault lines and then the synthesis, because the fun is in the friction. Osiris roams the skies in his mirror-hulled Conscience Egg, following the Mediterranean subduction arc from the Strait of Gibraltar to where it ends at the Zagros Fold‑and‑Thrust Belt where Zeus parried Atlantis's scalar howitzer projection and caused the Seymareh Landslip, the biggest landslide for 10,000 years. The traumatized Sumerians remembered it as Anu's rebuke of an impudent mountain - also a wrathful sky-father who in this mythos is oft-troubled by mountains with personalities who forget their place in the scheme of things and become prideful. Now even the European canal where the Wandervogel wanderers once trampe...

How to Use Your Handy-Dandy Laser to Prepare Your Cabbage Patch

Image
 Our species is not bound to any particular ecological niche. Culture is the reason. Culture is a system of behavioral adaptations. Physical anthropologists have over‑emphasized bones and tools and under‑emphasized behavioral patterns—cooperation, communication, avoidance strategies, and emotional/intellectual development. These are cultural capacities. Early hominids survived predators not through physical strength but through nonphysical behavioral patterns, which include cooperation, communication, group coordination, and ecological adaptation from the tropical savannah to the Arctic tundra. These are the earliest forms of culture—shared learned behaviors that increase the chances of survival. Culture is an emergent layer beyond biology and tools. The four parameters of human origins are: 1. physical changes   2. artifacts (tools)   3. behavioral changes   4. ecological context   The third parameter—behavioral change—is where culture resid...

The What Reform Really Means

Image
Two fictional characters have reward deficiency syndrome. Recent metaphysics prompted me to make one the reincarnation of the other. Jack Reid rescues several groups of refugees from a looming world war. An enemy sends the space habitat/lifeboat to an unknown part of the universe where they colonize an earthlike planet and face the same historical crises. Since it's too late to rectify the mistakes of America's recent past I thought I would reboot it. Americans still don't have the proper values to like lefties like Bernie and AOC, for example. Wayne Dyer never wrote about reward deficiency syndrome (RDS) directly, but his metaphysics gives me a surprisingly coherent way to interpret it. And because I’ve already been thinking about the link between neurodivergence and RDS from lived experience, I can treat Dyer’s framework as a symbolic lens rather than a clinical one. So how would Dyer’s karmic metaphysics frame Reward Deficiency Syndrome? Don't take RDS as a karmic pu...

When a Client State Goes Rogue

Keep asking structural questions, not partisan ones. That makes it much easier to answer clearly and safely. If we stay at the level of institutions, historical cycles, and elite blocs, we can say something meaningful without treating this as a literal “civil war” or taking political positions. A couple of weeks ago, I said that Big Oil had "lost" the Second Civil War (which was really a nonmilitary struggle like the one that eventually broke out as the War of the Roses). By this I mean that Big Oil’s loss was structural, not military. What I really mean is: - it lost autonomy, or the capability to act on its own discretion. - it lost agenda‑setting power - it became subordinate to global finance   - it no longer drives national strategy the way it did in the mid‑20th century   This wasn’t a defeat by another faction in a battlefield sense.  It was a shift in the architecture of power. What about the military‑industrial complex (MIC)? Also part of the Neoconfede...