Posts

I Don't Mourn for the Second Gilded Age

Curtis’s argument strongly implies that Americans accepted a kind of bribe, but not a literal payoff. He frames it as a psychological and political bargain: consumer pleasure in exchange for political disengagement. Curtis’s thesis in π˜›π˜©π˜¦ 𝘊𝘦𝘯𝘡𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘡𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘦𝘭𝘧 is that elites — corporate and political — used Freudian-derived PR techniques (via Edward Bernays) to redirect public energy away from collective political action and toward private consumption. The bribe is metaphorical. Consumer goods and lifestyle fantasies were offered as compensation for giving up deeper forms of democratic participation. Engineered desire replaced civic agency. Americans were encouraged to see themselves primarily as consumers, not citizens. This is supported by Curtis’s depiction of the 1920s shift from needs-based consumption to desires-based consumption, driven by Bernays’s techniques He argues that this shift helped stabilize society by channeling potentially disruptive mass impulse...

The Content Is the Title

Image
BlackRock doesn't need USia as a hegemon anymore. Besides, any attempt to regulate it would've caused it to pivot away and operate somewhere else. It's attracted to BRICS, but this multi-civ bloc is no longer a pushover.

Toldja So You Silly Persons

Image
This subject is driving me crazy because it's so multifaceted. Hudson obsesses about rent. So does Varoufakis, but he's going after Bezos who gets his cut from every transaction you make despite the fact that he never produced any of the goods you're buying from him. This is rent, too. The extraction of wealth without creating it. Hudson emphasizes Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate which dominates domestic policy. Hall fusses about the dictatorship of the bond vigilantes who prevent governments from providing services. Now water has been privatized and sewage is floating in the Thames. Finance loves to cut corners. Keen technocratically models how private debt accumulation leads to instability and collapse. The holistic phrase none of them use is how finance is in control of the economy as a whole, getting you every which way. This is the problem of overspecialization: each sector of economic activity behaves as if it were the whole economy. Let one sector dominate and it...

That Darn Culture

Image
  Once culture becomes a tertium quid between humans and Nature, any animal drawn into this cultural membrane becomes part of our symbolic order — and therefore part of our moral order. But that moral order is not simple stewardship. It’s custodial, contractual, and cosmological all at once. Our responsibility to domesticated animals is not just kindness or welfare. It is the obligation to maintain the integrity of the cultural membrane that pulled them out of Nature in the first place — to ensure that their lives, forms, and futures are not degraded by the very symbolic systems that redefined them. Culture domesticates animals by rewriting their ontology. Domestication is not merely taming. It is symbolic capture. A wolf becomes a dog not because its genome changes, but because culture assigns it a role, a meaning, a place in human ritual, a place in human labor, as well as a place in human affection. Domesticated animals are semiotic beings. They exist inside the human symbolic o...

Neither Fish nor Fowl

Neither fish, flesh, nor good red herring. Private equity is certainly a major force in U.S. industry, and activist investors are increasingly using national‑security narratives. But the Cleary Gottlieb analysis shows that the Trump administration’s equity interventions are government-driven, not PE-driven. Competing with PE. Ruling-class tools have turned against their sponsors before. The beneficiaries in these cases are indeed often the companies themselves, whose stock prices rise when the government takes a stake — not private equity firms. Trump (or more likely the Administration) is centralizing control by having the federal government take ownership stakes in strategically important firms. Justified under econ sec = nat'l sec but experts cite legal dubiety, risks corruption and conflicts of interest. Shareholders are suing arguing the Admin is illegally using laws meant for supply‑chain resilience to justify becoming a shareholder. This is the STATE acquiring equity. State ...

Western versions of hungry ghosts:

Lacanian objet petit a phantoms. In Lacanian terms, a child raised without love may form a “ghost” in the psyche — a persistent lack that haunts desire. It is not a being but a structural absence that behaves like one, shaping the symbolic order. Winnicott’s false self. When a child receives no attuned care, they may develop a “false self” — a protective apparition that stands in for the real self. It is a spirit of adaptation born from emotional starvation. Collective egregores of neglect. In occult theory, an egregore can form not only from shared intention but from shared deprivation — a group’s unspoken wounds coalescing into a psychic entity. A Toynbeean Time of Troubles practically breeds deprivation‑spirits — not necessarily literal ghosts, but the whole spectrum of psychic, cultural, and mythic entities formed from lack, from emotional starvation to institutional collapse. "Interesting Times" as a generator of “privation spirits”. An Epochal Crisis is defined by: Inst...

He Brought a Telescope to a Sumo Match

Got Sagan on my mind. It’s not widely documented online. It comes from one of William Irwin Thompson’s spoken stories—something he told in lectures and seminars rather than in his published books. Thompson often used H.G. Wells’s idea of a “Freemasonry of Science”—a transnational ethical brotherhood of scientists—to illustrate moments when scientific elites almost acted as a planetary moral order. The episode is his claim that Werner Heisenberg briefly considered organizing a kind of secret international scientific compact during the early atomic era. Thompson said that Heisenberg, horrified by the implications of nuclear chain reactions, contemplated whether scientists across nations might quietly agree not to pursue the bomb—essentially a real-world version of Wells’s imagined “Freemasonry of Science.” The idea was that scientists, not governments, understood the danger first. They might form a moral fraternity transcending national loyalties. They could collectively refuse to weapon...