Time to Leave Reform Up to the True Believers

The remedy for vested interests is blunt, structural, and entirely consistent with the macrohistorical model: renew the mechanism of prosperity by breaking the monopoly of the vested interests over surplus, innovation, and institutional control. In his framework, civilizations decay when groups that once fostered growth become rent‑seeking custodians of the status quo. The cure is not moral exhortation but institutional redesign that restores the flow of resources and authority to creative, adaptive sectors.

Vested interests must be dislodged from their control of surplus and decision‑making, usually through political reform, administrative restructuring, and the creation of new institutions that bypass or outcompete them.
Most likely this will begin with a whacking big explosion.

Such crises are caused by vested interests hoarding their cash instead of investing it in better ways of utilizing raw materials. Unfortunately this can scare the rank-and-file shitless, too. Short-sighted fossil fuel fools.

I ought to call reform "Solonization". Toynbee's "intensive development" is one of his least vivid phrases. Like "doing more with less" it describes a civilization turning inward to reorganize itself than outward to acquire new resources. But Toynbee's own examples are institutional reformers like Solon. Ashoka is another. The Gracchi tried, Diocletian succeeded so well that his Solonized bureaucracy became the foundation for Byzantine Civilization (and later Russian). There was also the Abbasid revolution. Wang Mang failed.
Our reformers caved to the Big Chill, turned into yuppies, and made way for the three giants MLK Jr. warned us about. He just didn't call it a Universal State.
The Democrats have become a merely dominant minority now. Their coalition with the GOP was strong, but the Republicans love to shoot from the hip and make a mess. Even so, "extensive growth" proceeds: the partitioning of Russia for ease of resource acquisition. And Southwestern Asia, too.
In the US it's what Toynbee called "stasis". A Matrix is what TPTB prefer, but instead it's a regular hugger mugger. Going nowhere regardless of how fast the wheels spin. Therefore social pressure continues to rise, mostly atomized individuals versus rigid institutions. Elite factions locked in zero-sum conflict. No frontier to relieve the tension except in our wars. Certainly no consensus on reform. Connected to this is the high risk of tyranny or civil war.
Accepting Peisistratization as the counter‑pole to Solonization is a genuinely clarifying move — and it immediately resolves the tension I once located in Pericles. Because once you adopt this pair of terms, Pericles simply cannot be the causal hinge of decline. He becomes what Spengler already implied: a summit figure, not a breaker.
The decline begins when the polis loses the capacity for Solonization and slides toward Peisistratization — the tyrannical resolution of stasis resolving factional conflict through personal rule, substituting charisma and patronage for institutional redesign. What is really needed is for our polity to rewrite its own operating system. Most folks here hate AOC, however.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Blueprint v. the Altar Call

Obama didn’t use the word deindustrialization as often as economists or critics did, but his administration’s stance is very clear in the record: he saw the long decline of U.S. manufacturing as a structural problem that needed active correction, not something to accept as inevitable.  In Obama’s view, deindustrialization was a threat to middle‑class stability. Obama consistently treated the erosion of manufacturing capacity as a danger to economic resilience and to the social fabric. His policy documents describe the loss of industrial jobs as something the federal government should reverse, not merely cushion. His “Blueprint to Support U.S. Manufacturing Jobs” explicitly framed offshoring as a harmful trend and proposed tax changes to discourage it. He regarded offshoring as a policy failure, not a natural market outcome.  Full marks, Mr. President!   His administration argued that the tax code rewarded firms for moving production overseas and needed to be rewritte...
Read more

The Throughput World Order

Image
Isn't Immanuel Wallerstein's "world system" just the latest variant of a Universal Empire? Not quite — and the distinction is pre'-damn-near illuminating once you tease apart what Wallerstein is describing and what Toynbee means by a Universal Empire. There's a rhyme, but they’re not the same creature. In fact, the gap between them is where the modern world hides its deepest structural weirdness. 1. A Universal Empire is a political unification. Toynbee’s Universal Empire is a single sovereign authority that forcibly knits together a civilization after its creative energies have died out. Its traits are unmistakable: - one imperial center   - one administrative shell   - one military monopoly   - coercive unity   - cultural mummification   Rome, Qin-Han, the Caliphate, the Mauryas — these are Universal Empires. They are states. A Universal Empire is a political solution to civilizational breakdown. 2. Wallerstein’s world-system is not a ...
Read more

The Century of Recovery

Image
Monbiot's reading list is pre=approved by moi. I have been following Raworth and Klein for years. They're hip to the evolutionary, historical, time-based entropy in human institutions which many take to last forever, taken for granted as products of natural law. My culture-hero character defined capitalism as profit-seeking in a price structure. He went on to say that fascism is the concluding form of capitalism. The seller will hold a gun to your head and compel you to buy only his product. This is when profit‑seeking detached from real human needs and from the social purpose that once justified it. And he's right to say that he saw a deep psychological deformation in the elites who came to dominate late‑stage financial capitalism when profit became an end in itself. Profit is never about human benefit, only incidentally. Human benefit is not its primary concern. The Quartet that financed Hitler were pseudo-psychotic psychopaths about profit. Any other system that did not ...
Read more