Torpedo

In a pre‑violent civil conflict, could a charismatic, polarizing figure be used by one elite faction as a “torpedo” to sabotage another faction’s long‑term project? And the answer, in structural—not personal—terms is: Absolutely. That is one of the classic moves in elite factional conflict.

Let me lay it out in a way that fits my “Second American / Third English” civil‑war‑on‑these‑shores frame and Oglesby’s Yankee–Cowboy dialectic.


Oglesby’s model is about elite factions using outsiders as weapons against each other. Yankees: finance, managerial elites, institutionalists. Cowboys: extractive, frontier, energy, Sunbelt, security‑state adjacent. In his telling, neither side fights directly. They launch proxies—politicians, movements, scandals, investigations, media storms—at each other. That’s very close to the gangster‑slang “torpedo”:  

a human projectile fired at a rival’s structure.

A political torpedo is someone who:

- is high‑impact,  

- unpredictable,  

- deniable,  

- and expendable if the mission goes wrong.

They are not meant to govern. They are meant to disrupt, derail, expose, or blow up a rival faction’s plans. In my imagined scenario, the “torpedo” would be:

- charismatic enough to attract mass attention  

- polarizing enough to destabilize the rival faction’s coalition  

- uncontrollable enough to create chaos  

- useful enough to weaken the Cowboys’ institutional position  

This is a classic elite tactic: use a disruptive figure to break the other side’s machinery. Staying strictly in the realm of fictional analogy and structural logic, not real‑world claims, a figure with Trump‑like characteristics could be used as a torpedo by a managerial/financial elite faction (Oglesby’s Yankees) to:

- fracture the Cowboys’ coalition  

- redirect populist anger away from the real problem and toward the imaginary ones  

- force the Cowboys into reactive, defensive posture  

- expose contradictions in the Cowboy political program  

- create enough chaos to prevent the Cowboys from consolidating a long‑term institutional project  

This is especially plausible in a pre‑military civil conflict, where:

- the struggle is symbolic, electoral, informational  

- elites fight through media, lawfare, scandal, and populist mobilization  

- the goal is to cripple the rival faction’s ability to govern  

In that environment, a torpedo‑type figure is extremely effective.

In Oglesby’s logic, the Yankees prefer:

- stability  

- global integration  

- technocratic management  

- predictable institutions  

But when threatened by a Cowboy insurgency, they may deploy:

- disruptive populists  

- scandal machines  

- charismatic chaos agents  

Not to rule, but to wreck. The torpedo’s job is not to build.  It is to detonate.

Why would the Cowboys be vulnerable to a torpedo? Cowboy coalitions tend to be:

- ideologically diverse  

- dependent on charismatic leadership  

- structurally brittle  

- reliant on frontier myths of unity  

A torpedo figure can:

- split their base  

- hijack their messaging  

- expose their internal contradictions  

- force them into purity spirals  

- drain their institutional bandwidth  

In a pre‑violent civil conflict, this is devastating.

Here’s the dramatic twist Oglesby would emphasize:

The torpedo often becomes uncontrollable. Once launched, he may:

- turn on his sponsors  

- build his own faction  

- become a third pole  

- accelerate the crisis beyond what the Yankees intended  

This is the tragic rhythm of elite proxy warfare.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Blueprint v. the Altar Call

Obama didn’t use the word deindustrialization as often as economists or critics did, but his administration’s stance is very clear in the record: he saw the long decline of U.S. manufacturing as a structural problem that needed active correction, not something to accept as inevitable.  In Obama’s view, deindustrialization was a threat to middle‑class stability. Obama consistently treated the erosion of manufacturing capacity as a danger to economic resilience and to the social fabric. His policy documents describe the loss of industrial jobs as something the federal government should reverse, not merely cushion. His “Blueprint to Support U.S. Manufacturing Jobs” explicitly framed offshoring as a harmful trend and proposed tax changes to discourage it. He regarded offshoring as a policy failure, not a natural market outcome.  Full marks, Mr. President!   His administration argued that the tax code rewarded firms for moving production overseas and needed to be rewritte...
Read more

MY HUMBLE CONTRIBUTION TO COGNITIVE FATIGUE (OR, CONATIVE PSYCHOLOGY WRONGLY VESTED)

Image
Conative psychology is the lesser-known sibling of cognitive, affective, and behavioral psychology — but it plays a crucial role in understanding human motivation and volition. While cognitive psychology focuses on thinking and reasoning, and affective psychology deals with emotions, conative psychology is all about doing — our drive, willpower, and purposeful action. The term “conation” comes from the Latin 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘳𝘪, meaning “to try” or “to endeavor.” It refers to the mental faculty involved in goal-directed behavior: how we initiate, persist in, and regulate actions based on our desires and intentions. In other words, conation is what bridges the gap between knowing and doing. Here are a few key aspects of conative psychology: - Volition and agency: It explores how people make choices and commit to them, even in the face of obstacles. - Motivated behavior: It examines the internal forces that push us to act beyond just instinct or emotion. - Self-regulation: It includes how we ma...
Read more

The Century of Recovery

Image
Monbiot's reading list is pre=approved by moi. I have been following Raworth and Klein for years. They're hip to the evolutionary, historical, time-based entropy in human institutions which many take to last forever, taken for granted as products of natural law. My culture-hero character defined capitalism as profit-seeking in a price structure. He went on to say that fascism is the concluding form of capitalism. The seller will hold a gun to your head and compel you to buy only his product. This is when profit‑seeking detached from real human needs and from the social purpose that once justified it. And he's right to say that he saw a deep psychological deformation in the elites who came to dominate late‑stage financial capitalism when profit became an end in itself. Profit is never about human benefit, only incidentally. Human benefit is not its primary concern. The Quartet that financed Hitler were pseudo-psychotic psychopaths about profit. Any other system that did not ...
Read more