Chanting Vespers in the Ruined Temple of Jupiter

The thing I always cared about more than anything else: culture is not sacred because it is beautiful, or symbolic, or identity‑forming — it is sacred because of what it does. I  treat culture almost like an engineering system: a living, evolving apparatus whose legitimacy comes from its outputs, not its sentiments.

Culture as an Adaptation Whose Meaning Lies in Its Consequences

1. Culture is an adaptation only insofar as it works. For me, culture is not primarily:

- a worldview  

- a set of values  

- a symbolic order  

- a shared identity  

Those are inputs or expressions. The adaptation is judged by its effects on survival, flourishing, and ecological fit. In my evolutionary framing, culture is the third layer — the behavioral layer — and its worth is measured by:

- whether it increases cooperation  

- whether it stabilizes group life  

- whether it improves the transformation of resources into “good and useful things”  

- whether it reduces vulnerability to ecological shocks  

Culture is a tool, not a shrine.

2. The “outcomes” lens makes culture morally ambiguous. If culture is an adaptation, then:

- it can succeed or fail  

- it can overshoot  

- it can become maladaptive  

- it can damage the environment  

- it can produce unintended consequences  

This is where my precept about “guided perturbation” becomes powerful. A living organism can drift into pathology.  

A cultural system can drift into overreach — my “cultural insertion into Nature.” Culture becomes dangerous when its outputs begin to:

- destabilize ecosystems  

- exceed carrying capacity  

- amplify human power without corresponding restraint  

- create runaway feedback loops (technological, economic, ideological)  

This is the “Phenomenon” Jacques Vallee is invoking — something trying to nudge the system back into ecological coherence.


3. Culture’s outcomes are the only real evidence of its health

If we take this statement seriously — that the outcomes matter most — then culture becomes diagnosable like an organism:

Healthy cultural outcomes:

- sustainable resource transformation  

- stable institutions  

- adaptive norms  

- ecological harmony  

- cumulative learning  

- resilience under stress  

Pathological cultural outcomes:

- institutional rigidity  

- extractive overreach  

- ecological degradation  

- runaway symbolic systems detached from reality  

- zero‑sum identity politics  

- loss of coordination capacity  

My space-bro character would say: When the outcomes go bad, the culture is no longer adaptive — it is decaying.

4. This is where the mythic lens becomes essential. I'm not just describing culture as an organism. I'm describing it as an organism that can be guided, perturbed, nudged — not controlled, but influenced.

The UFO “Phenomenon” becomes a kind of ecological immune response, a guardian of planetary equilibrium.

5. The radical implication. If culture is defined by its outcomes, then:

Culture is not what a society believes about itself. Culture is what a society does to the world. This is the Jesuit‑trained  sensibility I'm picking up on — the insistence that human meaning is inseparable from human consequences.

And it’s also where mythic renovation can do its most interesting work:  turning outcomes into glyphs, feedback loops into rites, ecological constraints into ceremonial law.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Blueprint v. the Altar Call

Obama didn’t use the word deindustrialization as often as economists or critics did, but his administration’s stance is very clear in the record: he saw the long decline of U.S. manufacturing as a structural problem that needed active correction, not something to accept as inevitable.  In Obama’s view, deindustrialization was a threat to middle‑class stability. Obama consistently treated the erosion of manufacturing capacity as a danger to economic resilience and to the social fabric. His policy documents describe the loss of industrial jobs as something the federal government should reverse, not merely cushion. His “Blueprint to Support U.S. Manufacturing Jobs” explicitly framed offshoring as a harmful trend and proposed tax changes to discourage it. He regarded offshoring as a policy failure, not a natural market outcome.  Full marks, Mr. President!   His administration argued that the tax code rewarded firms for moving production overseas and needed to be rewritte...
Read more

MY HUMBLE CONTRIBUTION TO COGNITIVE FATIGUE (OR, CONATIVE PSYCHOLOGY WRONGLY VESTED)

Image
Conative psychology is the lesser-known sibling of cognitive, affective, and behavioral psychology — but it plays a crucial role in understanding human motivation and volition. While cognitive psychology focuses on thinking and reasoning, and affective psychology deals with emotions, conative psychology is all about doing — our drive, willpower, and purposeful action. The term “conation” comes from the Latin 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘳𝘪, meaning “to try” or “to endeavor.” It refers to the mental faculty involved in goal-directed behavior: how we initiate, persist in, and regulate actions based on our desires and intentions. In other words, conation is what bridges the gap between knowing and doing. Here are a few key aspects of conative psychology: - Volition and agency: It explores how people make choices and commit to them, even in the face of obstacles. - Motivated behavior: It examines the internal forces that push us to act beyond just instinct or emotion. - Self-regulation: It includes how we ma...
Read more

The Century of Recovery

Image
Monbiot's reading list is pre=approved by moi. I have been following Raworth and Klein for years. They're hip to the evolutionary, historical, time-based entropy in human institutions which many take to last forever, taken for granted as products of natural law. My culture-hero character defined capitalism as profit-seeking in a price structure. He went on to say that fascism is the concluding form of capitalism. The seller will hold a gun to your head and compel you to buy only his product. This is when profit‑seeking detached from real human needs and from the social purpose that once justified it. And he's right to say that he saw a deep psychological deformation in the elites who came to dominate late‑stage financial capitalism when profit became an end in itself. Profit is never about human benefit, only incidentally. Human benefit is not its primary concern. The Quartet that financed Hitler were pseudo-psychotic psychopaths about profit. Any other system that did not ...
Read more