The Nobel Prize and Personality Assassinations


I'm feeling much better about Machado now. She is not a Latina version of the Fox-Trump Blondes.

Latin America and parts of South Asia (like Pakistan) form a kind of axis — not through direct alliance, but through shared structural traits:

Weak national institutions

Persistent oligarchic control

Resistance to Western-style modernization

Cultural fragmentation and colonial legacies

This “axis” is less about geography and more about civilizational inertia — regions stuck between tradition and modernity, often manipulated by external powers but never fully absorbed.

If we think in “ecolutionary” terms — evolutionary dynamics applied to cultural and political ecosystems — then Machado represents a mutational force within the Venezuelan subsystem:

She’s disruptive to the entrenched Bolivarian model.

She seeks institutional regeneration through liberal democracy and market reform.

Her movement is adaptive, responding to ecological collapse (economic, social, political).

In this sense, Machado is not a product of the Neo-Magian Axis  —  she’s a counterforce trying to break Venezuela out of its macrohistorical stasis.

Machado is a Civilizational Catalyst. Ideologically, she channels Enlightenment liberalism, not Unamunism or caudillo populism. Strategically, she appeals to transnational norms (human rights, rule of law), aligning Venezuela with Western evolutionary trajectories. Symbolically, she’s a “mutation” that could shift the entire Latin American ecosystem toward a new equilibrium.

So if macrohistorians saw Latin America as trapped in a civilizational cul-de-sac, Machado is trying to punch a hole through the wall. Whether she succeeds depends on whether her ecolutionary energy can overcome the inertia of the axis.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MY HUMBLE CONTRIBUTION TO COGNITIVE FATIGUE (OR, CONATIVE PSYCHOLOGY WRONGLY VESTED)

Image
Conative psychology is the lesser-known sibling of cognitive, affective, and behavioral psychology — but it plays a crucial role in understanding human motivation and volition. While cognitive psychology focuses on thinking and reasoning, and affective psychology deals with emotions, conative psychology is all about doing — our drive, willpower, and purposeful action. The term “conation” comes from the Latin 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘳𝘪, meaning “to try” or “to endeavor.” It refers to the mental faculty involved in goal-directed behavior: how we initiate, persist in, and regulate actions based on our desires and intentions. In other words, conation is what bridges the gap between knowing and doing. Here are a few key aspects of conative psychology: - Volition and agency: It explores how people make choices and commit to them, even in the face of obstacles. - Motivated behavior: It examines the internal forces that push us to act beyond just instinct or emotion. - Self-regulation: It includes how we ma...
Read more

Madness & Civilization

Image
The psychopathologies of today are like the psychopathologies of the death of feudalism and the First Hundred Years' War (or 1A and 1B) with the Scottish Wars wedged in to please Huizinga. The reason of the shift in focus from Scotland was that glory, profit, and status could be gotten more abundantly in France than in Scotland. And the late Middle Ages was clearly a period when the ruling classes thirsted for blood and hungered for glory, profit, and status. Whuffo? To say they wanted to monopolize land strikes many as monocausal and simplistic, but the failure by students of human experience (and the poor slobs' - er historical actors - inadequate interpretations of these experiences) to explain such aberrant manifestations even now is due to the fact that the students themselves are caught up in the processes they want to explain. They lack both the perspective and objectivity to discover sufficient explanations. Now we'uns is living in a similar situation. In both cases...
Read more

The Banner of the Solar Forge

Image
 A symbol of sovereign industry illuminated by stellar purpose. This started out as a convo on Twatter. I just finished discussing Ebenezer Scrooge. Pat Robertson thought Scrooge got rich by obeying the laws of God = laissez-faire. What he did with his profits was between him and God. I want to reclaim "elegance" but not as a mark of elite refinement. I liken it to a mathematical curve that intersects all necessary points, solving complex problems with minimal waste. This redefinition is central to my vision of a sustainable industrial future. Rather than associating elegance with aristocratic taste or aesthetic polish, I see it as technological and systemic coherence. Functional elegance is like a mathematical curve that passes through all required data points, elegant technology solves multiple problems simultaneously — economic, environmental, and social — without excess or contradiction. Upper-class affectations are the opposite. Always have been since the Bronze Age inva...
Read more